English
The entire site
Cannabis Social Club
Encod.org
European Coalition for Just and Effective Drug Policies (ENCOD)
Secretariat: Ploegstraat 27 – 2018 Antwerpen - Belgium
Tel: +32 (0)495 122 644
E-mail: office at encod.org

Home page > English (en) > NEWS > 2010 > UK: POLL SHOWS 70% FOR CANNABIS REGULATION

UK: POLL SHOWS 70% FOR CANNABIS REGULATION

Published on Friday 9 July 2010 16:40, by encod . Modified on Friday 9 July 2010 16:40

All the versions of this article: [English]

Press Release from Liberal Democrats for Drug Policy Reform

July 9, 2010


Three other drugs: Magic Mushrooms, Amphetamines, and Mephedrone show a majority in favour of legalisation and regulation, whilst 3 in 10 people would prefer the state regulate rather than prohibit heroin supply. These poll results demonstrate that the public is ready for a mature, open discussion of alternative approaches to drug policy and that there is no need for politicians to fear a backlash should they express doubts about the wisdom of our current approach.

Rather than just ask whether each drug should be “legalised”, the poll gave brief descriptions of three regulatory options and asked the public to pick which they thought most tolerable for each of a series of drugs.

The options were:

* Light regulation (drugs sold like tobacco and alcohol are now)

* Strict government control and regulation (an example of how government could heavily regulate a legal market in an attempt to minimise harm)

* and Prohibition (the current status of illegal drugs).

Headline results include:

* 70% support for cannabis legalisation/regulation, with 1 in 3 of those polled feeling that it should be sold in a similar way to alcohol and tobacco.

* More people supporting legalisation/regulation than prohibition for 3 other drugs: Magic Mushrooms (52% to 34%), Amphetamines (49% to 40%), and the recently banned “legal high” Mephedrone (41% to 39%).

* 39% support for the legal regulation of ecstasy sales, 36% support for regulation of cocaine, and 30% of respondents supported the legal regulation of heroin.

* For alcohol and tobacco over 1 in 4 respondents supported strict government control and regulation and 8% expressed a desire for tobacco to be prohibited.

Ewan Hoyle, founder of campaigning group Liberal Democrats for Drug Policy Reform says:

“The “Do you think x drug should be legalised?” question asked in polls up until now has failed to elicit any useful information. It may be interpreted by many poll participants as a question on their moral tolerance of drug use, or may conjure up thoughts of an unregulated free-market that they rightly judge to be dangerous. This poll shows that, when asked to choose between some of the actual regulatory options available, the public regards the strict controls and regulations that are being proposed by the reform movement as a sensible solution to our drugs problem.”

“The percentage favouring the legal regulation of Class A drugs is far higher than in previous polls and I would expect this percentage to rise still further as the debate progresses and the causes of the astronomical social and financial costs of problem drug use under the current system are explained. Prohibition of cocaine and heroin is causing, not preventing, massive harms to communities in the UK, and to all the countries in the world that this illegal trade touches.”

Steve Rolles of the Transform Drug Policy Foundation said:

"It is important that people understand that ‘legalisation’ is a process not a policy endpoint – and is one that can lead to strict government regulation of markets. It does not imply an unregulated commercial free for all that many may imagine if no other options are outlined. If anything an unregulated free for all is what we have under prohibition.

The important lesson for politicians is that they don’t need to be afraid of public opinion on this issue if it is presented in the more practical terms of market regulation"

From July 7 to July 9, 2010, Vision Critical conducted an online survey among 2,000 randomly selected British adults who are Springboard UK panelists. The results have been statistically weighted according to the most current age, gender, social class, region and newspaper readership data to ensure samples representative of the entire adult population of Great Britain.

Contacts for comment:

Ewan Hoyle - Founder of Liberal Democrats for Drug Policy Reform - 07817536149 or 01416493809

Mark Thompson - Prominent Lib Dem blogger and leading member of LDDPR - 07734730249

Steve Rolles - Transform Drug Policy Foundation - 01179415810

Share |

Reply to this article

2 Forum messages

  • I really believe that people are ready to support legalization, but we could learn something with this poll, that is the way we present the message, it is very, very important. If people are not supporting " drugs anti prohibition", maybe they understand: do you support this drug criminal system or prefer a state legal control? How to present the message it is incredibly important! Jorge

    Reply to this message

  • UK: POLL SHOWS 70% FOR CANNABIS REGULATION 12 July 2010 14:35, by Doobz
    I still find it absurd that only 1 in 3 support supplying heroin to addicts under controlled conditions. The issue really should be considered as :- Which do you prefer? a) Heroin addicts stealing to fund their habit or b) Supplying the unfortunate individuals with heroin at a fraction of the price and cost to society* *Please bear in mind that supplying heroin to addicts under controlled circumstances would reduce the numbers of new users to practically zero and eliminate the black market supply of heroin in this country. I also find it saddening that people with decent lives can be jealous of people living on the breadline with nothing more than their next fix to look forward to. Many addicts have had traumatic pasts that any sane person would not wish upon anybody. It’s time to stop the hate and jealousy, and take the pragmatic approach where society as a whole takes responsibility for the situation, rather than individuals within the society bearing the brunt of the cost of prohibition.

    Reply to this message

Site Map | Private area SSL NO SSL | WebMail SSL NO SSL | SPIP | Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict